![]() | Personally, I've never seen the point of Twitter and I don't have an account on it. Sure, if you want to keep up with specific news about someone/something, I guess it can help, but I can't think of anyone I'd want to 'follow'. For anyone who's not famous, it just seems like a huge vanity thing. I was dismayed when people started having their Twitter updates automatically copied to their Facebook status, especially when they couldn't be bothered to go onto Facebook and respond to comments. It was just a case of, "I'm so in love with myself, I'm sure the whole world will be totally wowed by the news that I'm making a cup of tea, or my cat just farted, or I'm watching some programme on the TV." And, as someone has said, it's largely one way. I gather people do comment on people's 'tweets', but I don't think it's in any way threaded, is it? I like the idea of Howwl (gonna have difficulty getting used to typing it, though) because it seems to take the best parts of Cix and Facebook (and possibly Twitter) and blend them into something that will probably prove far better than Facebook, while not as intense and aloof as Cix, and therefore hopefully better than Cix, too. The thing I don't like about Facebook is the way it's completely person-centric. Groups exist, but that's about all they do. I haven't found a way to get FB to alert me to new messages in groups so, like many others I know, I forget to check for activity in them. That said, it has the benefit that you find out interesting things about 'friends' you don't know very well, which you wouldn't find out under the conference/topic-centric structure of Cix. On Cix, someone you only know from a technical conference would be unlikely to mention a personal interest that could throw you together as real friends. I shall be interested to see how I get on with Howwl's ways of presenting conversations. From avril on Feb 28, 2010 Post 399 via Howwl |
![]() | Welcome, and I just hope Howwl lives up to your expectations! :-) Post 400 via Howwl, in reply to Post 399 |
![]() | I think you're being a little hard on Twitter -- some people use it as one-to-many text messengering. Facebook I agree is horrible, horrible, horrible, and I never got on with Cix. Like you, I have real hopes for Howwl. Post 412 via Howwl, in reply to Post 399 |
![]() | To be fair, Hannah, I don't have a Twitter account and have never watched anyone else using it, so it's just an impression I've gained from seeing it misused (IMO) via Facebook. One-to-many text messaging sounds like a reasonable use of it since it's a free way to do it. Presumably you can make those text messages only visible to the addressees? I don't entirely dislike Facebook. It's almost universal popularity has, at least, made it possible for me to maintain contact with a disparate collection of people, most of whom would never have joined Cix - and wouldn't have liked it if they had. And the fact that it's person-centric means I see updates about what all my contacts are doing without having to leave it to chance that I might see something they posted if I read a certain subject-based group. The interface is horrible, though, especially in private messaging. Better if you use Safari, which has the clever ability to grab the corner of a text input box and stretch it. But I prefer Firefox, which doesn't have that, and text you're typing can fall out of the bottom of the box for a line or two so you can't see it. Very poorly coded. The other thing I dislike about Facebook is the bombardment of stupid games. I suppose as far as its makers are concerned, it's a way to keep people on the site, and if you're logged in, your friends can pop up and chat to you. I leave it logged in all the time anyway, but I wish there was a button I could click to indicate that I'm not actually at my computer, so you can leave a message, but I won't see it until I get back. Some online chat systems have that. What's likely to make Howwl successful is learning from all the complaints about all the other systems. :-) Post 417 via Howwl, in reply to Post 412 |
![]() | "I wish there was a button I could click to indicate that I'm not actually at my computer, so you can leave a message, but I won't see it until I get back" Facebook shows people who are online but not active, as a crescent moon, rather than a full moon which is I guess for those who've recently been active. Post 420 via Howwl, in reply to Post 417 |
![]() | Yes, one of my main annoyances with Facebook is the endless, in-your-face apps. Someone really ought to tell them a social networking site is not a platform. Post 424 via Howwl, in reply to Post 417 |
![]() | What's likely to make Howwl successful is learning from all the complaints about all the other systems. :-) This is, of course, very true. But there's the problem of people having different complaints and wanting different things. I aim to keep Howwl focused on conversations being the primary function, and not falling into the trap of feature creep. Post 453 via Howwl, in reply to Post 417 |
![]() | On Cix, someone you only know from a technical conference would be unlikely to mention a personal interest that could throw you together as real friends. It's a fundamental weakness of highly-structured systems. One of the ideas behind Howwl is that it's open, in that you can follow people, tags, or just says. Everything should bleed into everything else, which is closer to how people have conversations in the real world, after all. Post 415 via Howwl, in reply to Post 399 |
![]() | which is closer to how people have conversations in the real world, after all. Exactly so, and that should make Howwl very engaging. Do you still want more beta testers? I mean, should we spread the word? Post 418 via Howwl, in reply to Post 415 |
![]() | Yes, I'd be most appreciative if you could spread the word. The plan is to let Howwl grow organically, and to adjust things as it goes. Post 419 via Howwl, in reply to Post 418 |
![]() | It's true what you say about technical conferences on CIX but there are so many that aren't technical I would have thought they would make more natural arenas for friendship to grow. Post 421 via Howwl, in reply to Post 418 |
![]() | There is more to twitter than, people using it as a vanity thing. Our local council uses it as a message board, and during the peroid of snow and ice it was very useful, it also alerted people to where they could report holes in the roads after the bad weather. The local Arts Society puts up their events as do other local community organisations. Many Companies have a twitter prescence, so it not just a vanity thing, I seldom post on twitter, but I do follow several interesting people. I don't really like facebook as the interface is appalling and the games stuff is annoying for me - I appreciate others enjoy the games. Sadly I just find cix deppressing these days, and have been avoiding it, for health reasons. Post 423 via Howwl, in reply to Post 399 |
![]() | No, I don't think Howwl will hurt Twitter business at all. From leoclayburns on Feb 26, 2010 Post 390 via Howwl |
![]() | I agree. From stevep in reply to leoclayburns on Feb 26, 2010 Post 392 via Howwl, in reply to Post 390 |
![]() | Given the number of visitors and sign-ups against the percentage of those actually posting, it may take a while indeed. :-) From stevep on Jan 25, 2010 Post 306 via Howwl |
![]() | In my experience, you shouldn't worry. There's various tipping points, and then everything explodes. Post 333 via Howwl, in reply to Post 306 |
![]() | I'd go along with that. I'd be amazed if word doesn't spread and Howwl kicks off. Then we can say how much better it was in the early days. :-) Post 416 via Howwl, in reply to Post 333 |
![]() | Howwl seems to be getting some stick from some beta testers. I find this v. strange, as it seems really good! And wtf is CIX? :) From frank on Dec 08, 2009 Post 115 via Howwl |
![]() | CIX is the UK's oldest discussion system going back to to the 1980's. Some of us here are from the CIX group on Facebook hence the large number of comparisons which that which we know. http://www.cix.co.uk Post 127 via Howwl, in reply to Post 115 |
![]() | Thanks. I was wondering. :) Post 130 via Howwl, in reply to Post 127 |
![]() | I joined cix a a few years ago but left after a few months. To be honest, I found it too cliquey, like arriving at a party a couple of hours after everyone had already mixed. It didn't have a very open vibe, and seemed a bit passé even then. Post 376 via Howwl, in reply to Post 127 |
![]() | I can understand that and it is a party that's been going a very long time. I can even recall feeling a bit like that when i joined in 1996 but at that time I found the general level of conversation interesting enough to make me want to stick around. It does seem to be a bit of a barrier these days as we have had so few new members in recent years and it's a shame for us that you didn't decide to stay. I still think the mechanism for conversation on CIX is very good with threaded conversations in specific subject areas that can go on for weeks with many hundreds of replies and a good level of expertise. However the system may well be doomed to a quiet extinction for the reason you state and for the fact that so many free (albeit clunky) alternatives are available on the web. From john stean in reply to hannah on Dec 08, 2009 Post 383 via Howwl, in reply to Post 376 |
![]() | Howwl doesn't seem clunky at all. I find it rather slick. Early days though. Post 413 via Howwl, in reply to Post 383 |
![]() | Yes - same here. Post 422 via Howwl, in reply to Post 413 |
![]() | I'm not sure we're really in the same game as Twitter, as I like to think of Howwl as being more conversational; Twitter tends to be one-way traffic (and extremely good at it). Of course, I'm rather flattered you make the comparison, and if we're a fraction of as successful I'd be more than happy. :-) From stevep on Nov 30, 2009 Post 37 via Howwl |
![]() | I can't see Howwl being the new Twitter. It isn't the same thing at all. That isn't a bad thing, of course. Post 50 via Howwl, in reply to Post 37 |
![]() | Howwl can become BIG in size as Twitter but the only difference being Howwl allows for conversations and not 'Status Updates' as Twitter does. But size wise, Howwl is going places... Post 52 via Howwl, in reply to Post 50 |
![]() | On the face of it the threading looks to be better than on Facebook. Well done for getting it together. Post 57 via Howwl, in reply to Post 37 |
![]() | It really does make threading waaaay better than facebook and any other "conversational" website... Post 261 via Howwl, in reply to Post 57 |
![]() | Thanks. That's the point, isn't it? :-) Post 266 via Howwl, in reply to Post 261 |
![]() | ...except possibly Cix! Good threading was always Cix's forté, and I suspect that's why you'll find many CIxen (myself included) interested in this site and its technology. Post 307 via Howwl, in reply to Post 261 |
![]() | Welcome to Howwl, Bryan. Of course it isn't just about threading (though it is important). Howwl will have a smartphone version of the site coming in a few weeks or so with the first API calls coming soon after that. Post 312 via Howwl, in reply to Post 307 |
![]() | CIX again. You old guys are obsessed! :) Post 320 via Howwl, in reply to Post 307 |
![]() | Who wants to be twitter anyway? The novelty of microblogging or whatever they call it is starting to wear down. Have you heard of all the famous tweeters going offline? Any twitter data prior to 2 days ago isn't even worth mining anyway. This howwl idea looks great! It takes the good features of twitter and applies them to a forum. Keep on keepin on. Post 139 via Howwl, in reply to Post 37 |
![]() | We will. Thanks. :-) Post 141 via Howwl, in reply to Post 139 |
![]() | I disagree (sort of). Forget the micro-blogging element but look at conversations being open. That's why the people behind this service should get the API working asap. Post 321 via Howwl, in reply to Post 139 |
![]() | The first API methods will be up in a week, with more to follow. The aim is to have a working API you can build apps with in around eight weeks. Post 361 via Howwl, in reply to Post 321 |
![]() | Isn't Google buzz trying to become Howwl? I see google buzz has most of the functionality of Howwl like threaded replies and stuff. Twitter is disorganised but as Steve ballmer recently said," The first mover advantage" is always there. From vinnythejinny in reply to stevep on Nov 30, 2009 Post 520 via Howwl, in reply to Post 361 |
![]() | Howwl is designed to be open, while Google Buzz is closed in that only your friends can see or reply to what you've said. Twitter is likewise open, and Howwl probably has more in common with Twitter, functionality aside. From stevep in reply to vinnythejinny on Nov 30, 2009 Post 552 via Howwl, in reply to Post 520 |
| Start conversations from your site or blog with the Howwl button. |